The Plus IP Firm intro animation

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY · PATENTS · SOFTWARE

Journal

Pathways For Software Patent Claim Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

DEREK FAHEY, ESQ.

Patent protection for software-related inventions can be challenging because interpretations of 35 U.S.C. § 101 continue to evolve. Applicants should understand the principal pathways to patent eligibility and draft claims and specifications with those pathways in mind.

Pathway A: Self-Evident Eligibility

Claims may qualify through a streamlined analysis when eligibility is apparent. Hardware-specific claims, such as those directed to a particular application-specific integrated circuit implementing an artificial neural network, may avoid reciting a judicial exception altogether.

When a software invention includes novel hardware or uses hardware in a novel way, those elements may provide a clearer path to eligibility.

Pathway B: Not Directed to a Judicial Exception

A claim may be eligible when it applies software to a concrete technical problem rather than merely reciting an abstract idea. A method that uses a trained neural network to detect malicious network packets, for example, can be framed as a practical improvement to network security.

Applicants should focus claims on specific implementation details and explain in the specification how the invention improves computer functionality or a technical field.

Pathway C: Significantly More Than a Judicial Exception

Even when a claim is directed to a judicial exception, it may remain eligible if additional elements amount to significantly more. This often requires an inventive concept that integrates the abstract idea into a practical application or applies it in a novel and unconventional way.

Strategic Considerations

  1. Engage patent counsel early. Eligibility often depends on careful claim drafting and a detailed understanding of current case law.
  2. Use detailed specifications. Explain the software’s operation, technical benefits, and real-world application.
  3. Anticipate § 101 rejections. Prepare factual and legal support before examination begins.

Conclusion

Software patent applicants can improve their position by emphasizing concrete implementation, technical improvements, inventive features, and detailed disclosure.

BY DEREK FAHEY, ESQ.DATE UNAVAILABLEPATHWAYS FOR SOFTWARE PATENT CLAIM ELIGIBILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101THE PLUS IP FIRM © 2026

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Derek Fahey Esq.

I am an engineer and a patent attorney. I truly love what I do. I am a naturally inquisitive person, I love understanding how things work and how I can make them better. I enjoy being involved with the creative process—and I consider myself very fortunate that as a patent attorney I can help people profit from their ideas, concepts and innovations. My clients inspire me, which compels me to help them so that they can improve the lives of others.

Meet DerekContact Derek
Derek Fahey, Esq.

CONTACT US

Begin With a Confidential Conversation.

Submit your information and select the service that best matches your needs. The Plus IP Firm will review your request and follow up with the next step.

OUR LOCATIONS

Miami, FL — Bona Fide Office

10204 NE 2nd Ave, Miami, FL 33138
786.443.7720

New York, NY
— Appointment Only

212.381.6189

Ft. Lauderdale, FL
— Appointment Only

754.703.8529

Tampa, FL
— Appointment Only

813.945.9579

West Palm Beach, FL
— Appointment Only

561.320.7689

Naples, FL
— Appointment Only

239.235.6494

Palm Beach Gardens, FL
— Appointment Only

561.203.9304