Category Archive for "Articles"

AMDOCS v. OPENET: ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A PATENT ELIGIBLE SOFTWARE INVENTION

admin

The Federal Circuit recently ruled in Amdocs (Israel) Limited V. Openet Telecom, Inc., Openet Telecom Ltd., No. 2015-1180, 2016 WL 6440387 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2016) (“Amdocs”), that a software patent’s claims were patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §…

Responding to Trademark Office Actions

admin

Many trademark applications filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) receive some form of office action.  A trademark office action is correspondence from the USPTO written by an examining attorney requiring an applicant to take some type…

October Newsletter

admin

The Plus IP Firm October Newsletter

Patent Lawyer Florida

HALO TEST FOR PROVING ENHANCED DAMAGES FOR WILLFUL PATENT INFRINGEMENT

admin

Recently in the case Halo Electronics Inc. v. Pulse Electronics Inc., 136 U.S. 1923 (2016), the U.S. Supreme Court lowered the standard and changed the test for proving entitlement to enhanced damages for willful patent infringement. In doing so the…

Patented Stamp

AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS FOR PATENTING AN INVENTION

admin

The purpose of this document is to explain the timeline of the process for patenting an invention or design.  The patenting process can be separated into a few main stages.  Our firm will shepherd your patent application through these stages…

Patent Lawyer Florida

UNDERSTANDING THE TRADEMARK REGISTRATION PROCESS

admin

The purpose of this article is to explain the timeline of the trademark registration process. The trademark registration process can be separated into stages.  The attorneys at The Plus IP Firm will shepherd your trademark application through these stages.  Please…

Patent Lawyer Florida

The Guardian

admin

In an exclusive piece written in The Guardian, Mark Terry of The Plus IP Firm was sought after to give his insight into the pending case against Apple. You can read the full article here.

Patented Stamp

What is the Test for Obviousness?

admin

One of the requirements for obtaining a patent on an invention is that the invention must be non-obvious. See 35 § USC 103.  Over the past 100 years, the standard for obviousness has changed significantly.  What has not changed is…

June Newsletter

admin

The Plus IP Firm June Newsletter

Patent Lawyer Florida

WHAT EXACTLY IS LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION?

admin

When you file a trademark application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), a trademark examining attorney will perform a search to determine, among other things, whether or not your mark is likely be confused with that of another…